Frontend
Component-driven interfaces with server rendering where SEO or first-load performance matters.
- React
- Next.js
- TypeScript
- Tailwind CSS
- React Native
- Flutter
Technology
We pick the boring, proven tool unless there is a specific reason not to. A stack you can still hire for in five years matters more than one that is exciting this quarter: you inherit the maintenance, not us.
Below is what we work in most. If your stack is not listed, ask: the list reflects what clients run, not the limit of what we will work on.
Our stack
Grouped by layer, with a note on when each one earns its place.
Component-driven interfaces with server rendering where SEO or first-load performance matters.
Long-lived server platforms chosen to match your team's existing skills wherever possible.
Infrastructure as code, reproducible environments and pipelines that deploy on merge.
Warehouses and pipelines with tested, version-controlled metric definitions.
Retrieval, evaluation and human-in-the-loop review around frontier and self-hosted models.
Automated testing and production visibility, treated as delivery scope rather than an extra.
Selection criteria
Technology choices outlive the people who make them. These are the tie-breakers we apply.
We run a database or a cluster yourself only when there is a cost, latency or compliance reason. Undifferentiated operations work is not a good use of your budget.
Where two options are close, we pick the one your engineers already know. Handover is part of the design.
New dependencies need a reason beyond novelty, and anything load-bearing has to have a maintained release history.
Put to work
Each service page lists the specific technologies that engagement typically involves.
Ask. The list reflects what our clients run, not the limit of what we will work on, and we would rather tell you we are not the right fit than learn your platform on your budget.